How to Act?
(10) 
That one corrects another or tells them how they should act is an action that renders the subject as property with a predestined outcome - rather than allowing them to unfold in their own way. This I would tentatively say is true - although it is obviously excerpted somewhat out of a whole. I agree that by doing so you are molding someone into something they are not. I would however also add that this is not always a bad thing. I have agreed whole-heartedly with some mass murderers - but I am not one.
Sometimes some people NEED to be told how to act - simply so that they know, or indeed have an optional reference point. Scary as it is - most people don't. They have the what they know and expect and the what they believe all others know and expect. These alone are (like it or not!) offensive to someone somewhere. The best anyone can hope for is to have a range of options, to choose wisely among them and as often as is commendable apologise for the offense that others take due to your choices.
We have all heard the exhortation: "Know Thyself" - I personally prefer: "that if that which thou seekest thou findest not within thee, thou wilt never find it without thee". If the student would become MORE than it is meet they first know what they are - for without all effort and understanding is doomed to failure.
The numbers of walking wounded who flee from the image they see in the mirror while engaged in occult study is staggering and it should also be noted that this applies doubly so to those who leave scorning those who showed them the way. To look at the face of they who have been sent in answer to your summons to lead the way and delight not is to hate yourself before you have had a chance to get to know you. - It is a great secret but what the hell I never vowed not to reveal that one.
Also let us say that for most students that have taken incarnation at this point in the cultural cycle it is absolutely necessary to have a fairly rigid format. They require a structure wherein to safely transcend their taboos and guides to ensure all remains well. Without this "Tabula Rasa" the student most often simply becomes the temple built on a mish mash of conflicting ideals - a nexus for unhealthy
mental and spiritual confusion. A lodestone that draws to it the same with an eye for propagation.
In terms of guides we also see quite often that for a healthy growth of emotion and thereby desire and true will it is entirely necessary that the student be allowed to develop a "Guru" and "Shaitan". When this is done within an externally monitored framework there is a much higher probability that the student will emotionally survive the transcendence of these that must naturally occur in order to redefine
the adult will.
This is best done when we test all available occult information-theory-data to see if/and/or how they work. This need not be in terms of academia, or even rationality but rather in terms of whether or not the data to hand "works" well for the subject in whatever world they are "at".
I argue that one must approach skeptically and try to remain as objective as possible. Observe, quantify, qualify, assess, question, act, observe AGAIN and draw conclusions based on the evidence. I used to encourage everyone who asked to write up all their workings like lab reports - it encourages an objective point of view which I believe sets apart the seeker who is likely to succeed from the multitudes of simple believers - who often succeed only in being duped by and/or food for various aberrations.
Unfortunately this is too often obscured by superstition and personal, emotional and even sexual fantasies. (I mean its use here in all senses!) This results in long ramblings of a largely delusional nature that, while very useful on certain levels generally does little but obfuscate and mangle base level understandings. Each
thing must be known for what it is and not what we personally would like to see it as. No, it is NOT all "My Mummy the __(Fill in Blank where appropriate)___ Goddess" nor is it the "My Daddy the __(Fill in Blank where appropriate)___ God".
Each thing is simply that which it IS and to treat it any different is to show disrespect for it's essential nature. And this certainly extends to those who repeatedly make use of vague archetypical language in order to say "all is this or that". This simply shows disrespect for the essential nature of individuality. That this occurs most frequently these days in reference to higher agencies (i.e. that subsection of the Macrocosm must often labeled "Gods" displays the perpetrators as being about as far from understanding of such matters as they are devoted - let all acts of devotion be those of love which in it's basest form is understanding of the essential nature).
It is easy to see here how the "Mommie Dearest" burblings of late years has much the same effect as the "Daddy Sternest" rantings of the Middle Ages. And while one professes to be so different from the other it is not - they are the same form filled in by two different protagonists. As we can see it is indeed true that all will see what they wish to, believe what they want to and (more unfortunately than anything else to my mind) set about demanding that everyone agree with their desired vision.
How may this be remedied? Well I can say from experience that it starts by being told how to act. I agree that by having had such done to me I was being molded into someone I was not. I would however also add that this was not always a bad thing. I have agreed whole heartedly with some mass murderers - but I am not one.
Sometimes some people NEED to be told how to act - simply so that they know, or indeed have an optional reference point. Scary as it is - most people don't. They have the what they know and expect and the what they believe all others know and expect. These alone are (like it or not!) offensive to someone somewhere. The best anyone can hope for is to have a range of options, to choose wisely among them and as often as is commendable apologise for the offense that others take due to your choices.
In Summary then, how offended must we be by the old magical command:
GOTO 10
before we remember that that which offends us is important in pointing out what we ourselves must face and do?
The secret lies in the understandings that every next step is a heresy, all true path walkers are betrayers to each and every that they have transcended and they who the walkers believe they have transcended are rarely little other than the walkers' desires projected unfairly onto another. That this is often pointed out with hate and regret and sorrow is simply due to our inborn desire to not let go of things. This especially is the case when the things in question are those which it is demonstrated to us fall under the category of "never ours in the first place".
When we decide a thing is ours we negate it's essential nature - even when it is done out of love. Herein lies the necessity of observation, information, truth and courage.
Am I what I am am I what I was am I what I will be.
Reality Regret Aspiration
This is for all and especially those who will never admit to having read it.
I said I would always share that which I found.
Here I have done so with no superstition to cloud the issue.
That many will not understand is understandable.
Those with ears will know I speak to them.
Those who do not understand will simply feel.
All I feel certain will gain what they are able.
I have done all I could without making you me.

That one corrects another or tells them how they should act is an action that renders the subject as property with a predestined outcome - rather than allowing them to unfold in their own way. This I would tentatively say is true - although it is obviously excerpted somewhat out of a whole. I agree that by doing so you are molding someone into something they are not. I would however also add that this is not always a bad thing. I have agreed whole-heartedly with some mass murderers - but I am not one.
Sometimes some people NEED to be told how to act - simply so that they know, or indeed have an optional reference point. Scary as it is - most people don't. They have the what they know and expect and the what they believe all others know and expect. These alone are (like it or not!) offensive to someone somewhere. The best anyone can hope for is to have a range of options, to choose wisely among them and as often as is commendable apologise for the offense that others take due to your choices.
We have all heard the exhortation: "Know Thyself" - I personally prefer: "that if that which thou seekest thou findest not within thee, thou wilt never find it without thee". If the student would become MORE than it is meet they first know what they are - for without all effort and understanding is doomed to failure.
The numbers of walking wounded who flee from the image they see in the mirror while engaged in occult study is staggering and it should also be noted that this applies doubly so to those who leave scorning those who showed them the way. To look at the face of they who have been sent in answer to your summons to lead the way and delight not is to hate yourself before you have had a chance to get to know you. - It is a great secret but what the hell I never vowed not to reveal that one.
Also let us say that for most students that have taken incarnation at this point in the cultural cycle it is absolutely necessary to have a fairly rigid format. They require a structure wherein to safely transcend their taboos and guides to ensure all remains well. Without this "Tabula Rasa" the student most often simply becomes the temple built on a mish mash of conflicting ideals - a nexus for unhealthy
mental and spiritual confusion. A lodestone that draws to it the same with an eye for propagation.
In terms of guides we also see quite often that for a healthy growth of emotion and thereby desire and true will it is entirely necessary that the student be allowed to develop a "Guru" and "Shaitan". When this is done within an externally monitored framework there is a much higher probability that the student will emotionally survive the transcendence of these that must naturally occur in order to redefine
the adult will.
This is best done when we test all available occult information-theory-data to see if/and/or how they work. This need not be in terms of academia, or even rationality but rather in terms of whether or not the data to hand "works" well for the subject in whatever world they are "at".
I argue that one must approach skeptically and try to remain as objective as possible. Observe, quantify, qualify, assess, question, act, observe AGAIN and draw conclusions based on the evidence. I used to encourage everyone who asked to write up all their workings like lab reports - it encourages an objective point of view which I believe sets apart the seeker who is likely to succeed from the multitudes of simple believers - who often succeed only in being duped by and/or food for various aberrations.
Unfortunately this is too often obscured by superstition and personal, emotional and even sexual fantasies. (I mean its use here in all senses!) This results in long ramblings of a largely delusional nature that, while very useful on certain levels generally does little but obfuscate and mangle base level understandings. Each
thing must be known for what it is and not what we personally would like to see it as. No, it is NOT all "My Mummy the __(Fill in Blank where appropriate)___ Goddess" nor is it the "My Daddy the __(Fill in Blank where appropriate)___ God".
Each thing is simply that which it IS and to treat it any different is to show disrespect for it's essential nature. And this certainly extends to those who repeatedly make use of vague archetypical language in order to say "all is this or that". This simply shows disrespect for the essential nature of individuality. That this occurs most frequently these days in reference to higher agencies (i.e. that subsection of the Macrocosm must often labeled "Gods" displays the perpetrators as being about as far from understanding of such matters as they are devoted - let all acts of devotion be those of love which in it's basest form is understanding of the essential nature).
It is easy to see here how the "Mommie Dearest" burblings of late years has much the same effect as the "Daddy Sternest" rantings of the Middle Ages. And while one professes to be so different from the other it is not - they are the same form filled in by two different protagonists. As we can see it is indeed true that all will see what they wish to, believe what they want to and (more unfortunately than anything else to my mind) set about demanding that everyone agree with their desired vision.
How may this be remedied? Well I can say from experience that it starts by being told how to act. I agree that by having had such done to me I was being molded into someone I was not. I would however also add that this was not always a bad thing. I have agreed whole heartedly with some mass murderers - but I am not one.
Sometimes some people NEED to be told how to act - simply so that they know, or indeed have an optional reference point. Scary as it is - most people don't. They have the what they know and expect and the what they believe all others know and expect. These alone are (like it or not!) offensive to someone somewhere. The best anyone can hope for is to have a range of options, to choose wisely among them and as often as is commendable apologise for the offense that others take due to your choices.
In Summary then, how offended must we be by the old magical command:
GOTO 10
before we remember that that which offends us is important in pointing out what we ourselves must face and do?
The secret lies in the understandings that every next step is a heresy, all true path walkers are betrayers to each and every that they have transcended and they who the walkers believe they have transcended are rarely little other than the walkers' desires projected unfairly onto another. That this is often pointed out with hate and regret and sorrow is simply due to our inborn desire to not let go of things. This especially is the case when the things in question are those which it is demonstrated to us fall under the category of "never ours in the first place".
When we decide a thing is ours we negate it's essential nature - even when it is done out of love. Herein lies the necessity of observation, information, truth and courage.
Am I what I am am I what I was am I what I will be.
Reality Regret Aspiration
This is for all and especially those who will never admit to having read it.
I said I would always share that which I found.
Here I have done so with no superstition to cloud the issue.
That many will not understand is understandable.
Those with ears will know I speak to them.
Those who do not understand will simply feel.
All I feel certain will gain what they are able.
I have done all I could without making you me.


