Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Oh and this just in .....

Oh well them's the breaks .... with any luck he has gone to where he wants to be.

I don't think I can be fairer than that.

Evangelist Jerry Falwell dies

Wednesday May 16 09:03 AEST

WASHINGTON - US evangelist Jerry Falwell, who helped turn the religious right into a powerful political force and fired controversy with his battles against abortion and homosexuality, has died aged 73.

He was found unconscious in his office at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, and was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital just over an hour later, said Dr Carl Moore, his personal physician.

The evangelist, who had a history of heart problems, had no heartbeat when he was found by colleagues, Moore said, adding he apparently died of a heart rhythm abnormality.

Falwell's increasing influence in the 1970s and 1980s coincided with the rise of the US religious right, whose votes helped send conservative Republicans including Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush to the White House.

Fond of quipping that the Bible referred to "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve," Falwell provoked a storm of protest when he said gays, lesbians and health workers who provide abortions were partly to blame for the September 11 attacks.

"I really believe that the pagans and the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians ... all of them who have tried to secularize America, I point the finger in their face and say: you helped this happen," he said.

Reactions to Falwell's death reflected the bitter divide over his views, and over the role of religion in political life in the United States.

President Bush said he was deeply saddened by Falwell's death, calling him "a man who cherished faith, family and freedom."

"Jerry lived a life of faith and called upon men and women of all backgrounds to believe in God and serve their communities," Bush said in a written statement.

Another leading evangelist, Pat Robertson said: "Jerry's courage and strength of convictions will be sadly missed in this time of increasing moral relativism."

Ellen Johnson, president of American Atheists, said Falwell was "instrumental in galvanizing millions of American evangelicals into an intolerant, sectarian and authoritarian political movement."

"Gays, women, secularists, civil-libertarians and other groups who did not fit into his plan to construct 'One Nation Under God' were stigmatized and attacked." she said.

Born on Aug. 11, 1933, Falwell said he was "born again" on Jan. 20, 1952, the day he converted to Christ while at Lynchburg College.

He founded the Thomas Road Baptist Church in his hometown of Lynchburg in 1956 and went on to found Liberty University in 1971 -- a conservative center of higher learning.

In 1979, he started the Moral Majority organization, which became a major vehicle for getting out the vote for the Republican Party.

He disbanded the Moral Majority in 1989 but it was resurrected as The Moral Majority Coalition, with an explicit political purpose, after Bush's re-election in 2004.

"He became a leading voice by the time of Ronald Reagan's emergence in 1980 and the whole concept of family values was adopted by the Republican Party," presidential historian Douglas Brinkley told Fox News.

"His influence in politics was very real because he helped politicize evangelicals and other religious groups, the right side of the Southern Baptist Convention ..."

With his gray hair and heavy jowls, Falwell was a familiar face on the televangelist circuit.

He saw evil in a once-great America that he believed was in an advanced state of decay. He even went after a character in the hit children's TV show the "Teletubbies," saying the purple Tinky Winky character donned pro-gay symbols, including a triangle.

"I think that in the early 1960s when Bible reading and prayer were expelled from the public square, I think that was a move in the wrong direction, it was a move towards secularization," Falwell told Reuters in February.

Papa - Ergo Sum?

This gem was one day after the previous article about head hunters (May 15) and raises the point. Are we what we face? Or are we what we are?

Lots of people these days don't REALLY know.

In fighting monsters one needs must take care to not become one.

The fact here is that what amazes me most is that anyone thinks this is actually news.

The Pope is someone I have a growing amount of respect for (ironic? perhaps!)

The simple fact is that I do NOT HAVE to agree with his religion or politics to admire a man who stands up and says:
"NO. I am here to do a job. I am here to promote my religion
(that IS his job after all!) and i believe in it. Most often some parts of it will not make me popular but my job does not require me to be popular!"

No one should be surprised that this Pope thinks that the best thing to ever happen to them in some ways would be the application (I use that word advisedly!) of his religion to them. Frankly even if he did not think so his job IS to say so!! Again - not surprising that is his job!

It is LIKEWISE the job of the indigenous groups there to send an official complaint stating the contrary.

THAT is THEIR job.

If BOTH of them now continue to do their job, then the Vatican will send them a letter that says a few things about not much agreement and the groups should take the letter and file it.

At the end of the day it is better for them to read it and then discard it - they have other things to do then to engage pen pals who by definition can not agree with their stance.

It is my fervent hope that they continue to go through channels when it may help them and channel the rest of their energies into keeping their ways alive and well.

After all that does not require ANY contact with Catholicism really now does it? Indeed one could even argue that this course of action would be best served by keeping a distance.

As I find myself saying so often these days:

"Everybody got a job to do and if everybody were to put as much effort into THEIR jobs as they waste investigating the work of their neighbour we'd be well ahead of schedule!"

Witchcraft still dangerous ... to everyone!

Well now ... I can ACT surprised if it helps!! You know long back in the day (as they say) all witches were considered cannibals. Were I to feel waggish I may call them "Eaters of the Dead".

Is it reality or not?

One world wide vision?

Gimme gimme gimme Fried Chicken.

All comedy aside - consider the rammifications.

Myself I say, as I did on a list this very day:

"I say give me disagreement!

The LAST thing I EVER want to see isagreement amongst different peoples on the fact that they are " really the same afterall".

Feh! Taken etymologically witch by definition can't mean "popular" (and "Pagan" even LESS SO!) I can think of nothing more revolting than endless sameness amongst my cousins (and I consider all to be so!)

I love the fact that we have tree huggers and (if you have been reading the papers) possibly even head hunting cults still active! Give me mad alchemists and crazed neophytes! I relish crazed air heads and the most serious of historians!

I am thrilled that in most of the world witchcraft is still a deadly business no matter HOW innocuous one is.I want proud, powerful, strong practitioners who BELIEVE their way and just do it.

If you believe it stand up like you got the pair and get on with it sez I !

Anything else for me is second best and I'll wager most others think the same."

What I will say here that I did not say there is this last bit:

"Anything else for me is second best - as it would not be reality. There are many things about the world I don't like when examined closely but I love the fact that it is so!"